|
|
Real World Gear: Change For The Better (Part 1)
The emergence of multi-channel amplifiers
By Jeff Kuells and John Murray

For years, power amplifiers with multiple channels (generally defined
as more than two) were for either multiple headphones in studios or low-power-per-channel
commercial applications.
But are multi-channel amps viable for mainstream professional sound reinforcement?
You bet. Times have changed, and once again with regard to equipment,
the change is for the better.
|

|
 |
TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANTAGE
Units with three to six channels have actually been around since
the early ‘80s. However, these either had a rather low power-per-channel
rating or were fraught with design and reliability problems. As
a result, relatively few touring or commercial professionals used
them.
With the advent of switching power supplies, PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
class D output topologies, these design limitations are becoming
a thing of the past.
Most of the major players in the amplifier production game (as well
as a host of lesser known ones) have recently shown an increased
proliferation of models in the genre.
|
Professional user acceptance is also becoming more widespread as a result.
The advantages are obvious. New output topologies are more efficient and
waste far less energy. The classic A/B class is perhaps 40 percent efficient,
while some of the newer class D designs are up to 95 percent efficient.
This means smaller, lighter power supplies and far less heat that needs
to be dissipated by fans or large heat sinks.
Newer switching power supplies, already required to produce only half
the power for class D versus class A/B output stages, also jettison the
large, heavy and expensive power transformers required of yesterday’s
power supplies.
Thus the size and dollar-per-watt of multi-channel amps has been dropping
dramatically in recent years. Typical chassis sizes range from 2U to 3U
rack spaces, with 4 to 8 channels common. Weight reduction is also substantial.
Few multi-channel units exceed 40 pounds while producing as much or more
power per channel than heavier two-channel units of decades past. Less
weight isn’t as critical for fixed installations as for portable use,
but less rack spaces and more channels benefits both markets greatly.
IT ADDS UP
Cost savings is another big advantage. Multi-channel amps cost less to
build. Not only is there less metal per channel and no power transformer
when using switching supplies, but fewer components, such as power cords,
switches, fuse holders, circuit breakers, etc., adds up and the savings
is passed on to the buyer. Further cost savings can result from less rack
space used, thus less racks needed, and for mobile use, less truck space
occupied, faster load-ins, load-outs, etc.
The main disadvantages of these newer multi-channel amps are a lack of
power-supply redundancy and new-technology reliability. With most multi-channel
models, there’s only one power supply for all the channels, so you can
have up to eight channels on one supply, as compared to the traditional
two channels per supply.
Amp-channel failure usually results in the power supply being turned off
for all channels, although some models avoid that problem using intelligent
circuitry or simply employ multiple power supplies.
However, before assuming that one power supply is a disadvantage, consider
the application. For studio or home theater applications, it’s generally
not all that critical. For live uses like stage monitoring, it can be
quite the opposite. Your application will be the deciding factor here.
How reliable is this new technology? If you ask the manufacturers, it’s
rock solid. If you ask the “bleeding” users on the cutting edge that have
experienced problems, you’ll get a different answer.
The bottom line, as with all new technology, is that commensurate reliability
will come with the passage of time. There was a day when those new-fangled
transistor-based amplifiers would blow up if you looked at ‘em sideways,
and only tube models were dependable.
The best hedge is to ask around and find out which brands have got the
reliability angle figured out. One thing is for sure - this new approach
will be a rock-solid reliable mainstream design in the near future.
WHERE THEY GO
Probably the most popular use multi-channel amps to this point has been
for commercial installed systems, where more channels in the same package
are great for multi-zoned background music and paging systems, such as
those common to restaurants, clubs, churches and commercial buildings.
The power requirements for these installs are generally less demanding,
while the number of channels required is higher than for mobile use. These
applications lend themselves to the lower-powered, conventionally designed
units that have been available for decades and have been accepted over
the years. This has also spawned the 70-volt versions with limited low-frequency
capability and optional isolations transformers available on the market
today.
The big growth potential for multi-channel amps is in the pro realm. The
newer technologies now allow full-range high-power channels in very small,
light, and efficient packages. Where once only large, heavy, two-channel
amps were the only choice, now four-plus channels of equal or more power
can occupy the same rack real estate and weigh less.
Multi-channel amps are here to stay, and will likely see more proliferate
use in larger, dynamic sound reinforcement systems as we move forward.
More and more monitor mixes, as well as the multiple amp channels needed
for line arrays are applications that cry out for multi-channel amps.
These units simply bring too much to the table to be ignored.
Jeff Kuells is an audio engineer and Live Sound’s amplifier
editor. Reach him at proamps@foothill.net.
Live Sound Technical Editor John Murray is a 27-year industry veteran
who has worked for EV, MediaMatrix, and TOA. He has presented two published
AES papers, chaired four Syn-Aud-Con workshops, is a member of the TEF
advisory committee and an ICIA Adjunct Faculty member. He can be reached
at jmurray@-livesoundint.com
December 2003 Live Sound International
|