The Switch: Eric Clapton's Last Large Tour
Full stride, five years later

Over the last eleven years, LIVE SOUND International! covered several Eric Clapton tours in Western Europe and the US. The Clapton tour loudspeaker systems always remained the same, until 2001 when some serious changes were made. What follows is an LSMAG! update on the Clapton PA upgrade.



The switch was on for Robert Collins of Concert Sound, a leading U.K. hire company and Eric Clapton’s FOH engineer during the past thirteen years. Following an extensive demo of an Eastern Acoustic Works (EAW) KF900 Series rig (see Photo #1), Clapton’s “Reptile” tour broke from traditional Clapton touring rigs, specifically the EAW KF850 Series in Europe, and Showco Prism in the North America.

A BIG DEAL

“The decision to make the switch was a big deal, because Eric and the production team were happy with what they had been using,” explained Curtis Flatt of Spectrum Sound, Nashville, the hire company for the U.S. leg of the tour. “Robert (Collins) put it all on his shoulders. If the new system didn’t work to everyone’s satisfaction, it would have reflected poorly on him. He bit off a huge bit of responsibility and made it happen.”

Rusty King of Spectrum resides in the U.K. and worked with Collins and Concert Sound on some of the basics, with EAW’s David Gunness (see Photo #2) the KF900 Series designer hopped across “the pond” to offer additional insight.

The respective hire company principles, Tim Boyle of Concert Sound and Ken Porter of Spectrum, shared philosophies while making refinements and managing details. Meanwhile, EAW’s European-based technical specialist, James Bamlett, lent his experience, specifically in creating a more “British Sound” from the system.

“The demo process started in a smaller arena, and continued on to a bigger outdoor space where everyone became very comfortable with the operation and performance of the system,” Flatt continued. Following some initial work during the demo phase, Flatt again joined Collins and company in London during the last of a series of dates at Royal Albert Hall.

Serving as system tech, he continued through the remaining duration in Europe before assuming the same role as the tour moved on to the U.S., with Spectrum supplying their KF900-based rig.

SPECIAL TALENTS

“It all starts with Eric, his hands, his voice, his person,” Flatt noted. “His guitar is just that, joined only by a wah-wah pedal and a guitar amp. These elements are way on top of the mix, with far less emphasis on the lower end and bass drum.”

The mix is filled out by the tasteful accompaniment of an all-star band, headlined by Billy Preston on Hammond B3, Andy Fairweather Low on backing guitar and vocals, Steve Gadd on drums, Nathan East on bass and David Sancious on piano/keys. While these contributions are largely layered beneath Clapton, they’re still rendered distinctly.


Photo #1: KF 900s Flown in Chicago for the Last
“Large” Eric Clapton Tour

Clapton switched from his long-time Shure SM58 vocal mic to an Audio Technica 4054 during recent multitrack recording of shows. Flatt explains that the 4054 sounded “much better” in the production truck, specifically reducing the stage “bleed”.

Further, the 4054 proved to more consistently capture Clapton’s voice despite constant activity and movement during a show.

Collins employed a minimalist approach, with a few sparsely applied effects devices. Four channels of gates and ten channels of compression, often remained idle for several songs at a time.

No mic preamp is deployed. The mic goes directly to the Midas XL4 house console, with a dbx 160 compressor added on the output. A strategic few dB of compression is applied, but only during appropriate songs.

“The house system for this tour has pretty much standardized, particularly in the U.S.,” Flatt said. “We’re playing very similar arenas, nothing outdoors, and there’s rarely a need to change things from venue to venue with the exception of trim height on the main arrays.”

UNIFORM SPL

Now five years old, the KF900 Series was designed to supply full-bandwidth coverage over vast distances, with extreme pattern control via several patented loudspeaker technologies and complex digital signal processing. The overriding goal is attaining broadband, uniform sound pressure levels in both the vertical and horizontal planes, at very long distances and with tight control and focus of sound throughout the listening area.

Part of this is addressed with Phased PointSource Technology (PPST), a Gunness development where all horns and drivers of each loudspeaker are placed as close together as possible, so that in multiple arrays they act as either a line array in the vertical plane or as a point source in the horizontal plane. Close driver spacing also makes for relatively compact enclosures.

The digital processing allows the coverage pattern to be fine tuned, with the vertical axis actually steered. Control in the horizontal plane is largely achieved with horn acoustics, while in the vertical plane it’s done mostly with electronics.

Spectrum Sound played a key role in the KF900 development process, utilizing a prototype rig with a Promise Keepers stadium tour, with Gunness traveling along and making incremental adjustments and improvements that were incorporated in the first production version.

The KF900 initially faced a considerable obstacle in being utilized for dynamic concert touring applications. Specifically, a digital processing solution with enough horsepower to optimize the system hadn’t yet been created in a practical, road-ready form. Subsequent developments in the DSP realm, including the BSS Soundweb processing units deployed for the Clapton tour, altered that scope.

ARRAY STRUCTURE

The two main loudspeaker arrays utilized for this tour are topped by two rows of KF930 long-throw low-frequency (4x15in loaded) modules, while the third row includes two different versions of upfill (or downfill depending on need) modules.

Dual KF914 long-throw upfill loudspeakers, making their debut on this tour, are positioned at the onstage side of each array, providing coverage to the furthest reaches of each arena. These are flanked by dual KF913 medium-throw modules for the upper “flanks” of the audience area. “The KF913’s, in particular, really put it up fast at about 40degrees,” Flatt commented.

These are followed by two rows of KF920 long-throw mid-range modules, each with three 10-in cones loaded on separate horns, and covering the vast majority of floor seating. A final line of KF913 modules, flipped “right side up”, handle downfill to all but the first few seating rows.


Photo #2: Dave Gunness in Mid- Measurement

“I’ll be honest: you had to be a rocket scientist to run the processing for these arrays when they were first introduced,” Flatt says. “But now, while it still takes a lot of processing power, the factory settings have been refined so that they’re pretty much what you want, each time out, and then it’s just a matter of individual taste for final settings and tweaks.”

Supplemental coverage to the front comes from four EAW KF750’s stacked, and tightly packed, on top of the system’s nine EAW SB1000e subwoofers stacked beneath each main array.

Four compact Turbosound two-way loudspeakers lined the stage front to add mid/high fill at the center.

Large video screens flown to each side meant the main arrays couldn’t continue to wrap back around to supply coverage to audience areas to the sides and to some extent, the rear of the stage. Instead, small KF700 Series arrays were flown behind the video screens, with inverted KF755 downfill modules handling upper regions, dual KF750’s covering the center and a single KF755 for downfill.

“Ideally you don’t want to split coverage, but having something as small as the KF700 Series that can do the job in terms of output, projection, control and matching the signature of the main arrays, has made it a whole lot easier to accept,” Flatt observed.

Flatt also acknowledged the general misconception, likely due to its horn-loading and overall output, that the KF940 is for long-throw applications. Spectrum normally uses EAW KF940 horn-loaded subs with the KF900 rig, but SB1000e’s were the choice due to familiarity among the British crew.

ORIENTATION IS EVERYTHING

EAW’s Dave Gunness has spent years in the intensive research of horns, pattern control and beam steering, with the results of this work coming into play in the upfill and downfill loudspeaker modules found in the KF900 Series system. EAW has been awarded a patent (U.S. Patent Number 6,009,182) for the upfill and downfill technology invented by Gunness, and it is also employed in the company’s KF700 Series line of touring loudspeakers.

Both the KF913 (3x2in on a single horn) module, designed for medium-throw applications, and the new KF914 (4x2in on a single horn), supplying longer throw, incorporate horn designs that work in tandem with KF900 Series intensive digital signal processing (called PPST), result in precision upfill or downfill coverage.

Selection between upfill and downfill is simply a matter of cabinet orientation (“upside down” or “right-side up”), and in either position, the module fits within a standard horizontal array structure. As applied to the KF913 and KF914, the DSP helps steer coverage for listening areas that might be significantly above the trim height of the array and/or reside in the extreme near field.

“Particularly in arenas, there’s a subtlety in the way the coverage pattern must fit within the room,” Gunness explains. “One particular challenge we’ve addressed is the ability to attain quality coverage to upper level seats both in the far and near fields.”

Upper seating areas closer to the arrays ­ on the “sides” of the coverage area ­ present a very steep upward coverage angle, with this angle lessening further out into the room. KF913 modules offer medium-throw capability but with a more steep upward firing angle to provide the commensurate side coverage.

Meanwhile, the longer-throw KF914 modules have a less steep upward angle and are therefore well-suited for high-quality full-bandwidth coverage to the “back” upper level seating sections.

Gunness developed optimum settings for a wide range of configurations and venues, using his proprietary F-Chart modeling software. These settings are provided to the touring company, with only minor tailoring adjustments needed from that point.

SOUNDWEB & SIM

Control interface and loudspeaker processing parameter changes were controlled by eight FOH networked Soundweb units linked to a host PC. The KF900’s were run in stereo, as well as the ground support arrays and even the subs, which are fed from the left/right bus. Both side-coverage clusters receive mono feeds.

Three QSC RAVE 161 units, each handled sixteen channels of audio inputand routed the digitized signal from FOH to QSC Ethernet hubs at the amp racks, which were tucked beneath the set. Based on CobraNet technology, the RAVE units employ standard Ethernet to transport multiple channels of high-quality, uncompressed, digital audio in real time. The channel-carrying capacity of CobraNet enables 128X audio channels to be carried over a single CAT5 cable, virtually eliminating the large multi-core cable traditionally used in Performance Audio.

CyberLogic NC916 PowerPlants, formed into 16-channel blocks, supplied up to 1,600W at 4ýs. These were also equipped with multi-pole connectors making for simple, quick connection to the loudspeakers, and included a 208VAC Delta 3-phase power supply to smooth the load distribution.

SIM certified, Flatt deployed a full SIM rig for each show, looking primarily at time alignment before moving on to address anomalies unique to each individual arena. From there, Collins made final tuning by ear. Smaart could also be an attractive choice for tuning, but there’s not enough capacity left at the house console to accommodate multiple reference mics.

System levels usually hovered around 107dB at FOH, although this can drop during poignant ballads. Rather than engaging in “battle the audience,” the sound team preferred restraint with respect to levels, and the crowd proved to quiet accordingly, making louder songs that much more dynamic.

“The key to this entire rig is that you have to step back and simplify,” Flatt concluded. “The more simple you make it out to be, the more simple it is. But like other premium quality systems for very large concert applications, you don’t send this rig out with just anyone, fly the arrays, and expect all to be perfect.

“You need to learn the rig, understand it and be fluent in it, and then you take it to a higher level. This is the way you have to approach any higher-end system, including the line arrays that have recently hit the market.

 

September/October 2001 Live Sound International

Email this story to a friend.