|
|
Factory Direct: Advancing the Art
Three years in design, McCauley antes up
By Jason Farris

|

McCauleys MONARC MLA5 flown at the site.
|
 |
In recent years, system engineers have been nearly universally
attracted to line array sound reinforcement systems for their special
ability to achieve nearly homogenous SPL over the coverage zone,
while maintaining exceptional clarity over distance.
As a result, in what has become a very competitive market segment,
several new line arrays were introduced by various manufacturers
during the past calender year.
McCauley Sound was founded in 1979, and over the intervening years
the company has become known for their “total control“ all-in-house
approach to system engineering and manufacturing.
Based in the company’s long history of industry breakthroughs,
McCauley’s new MONARC™ line array technology appears to an immediate,
legitimate challenger in the white hot line array wars.
|
MLA5 OVERVIEW
The MLA5 is a low-profile, axially symmetrical, three-way line array module
based on McCauley Sound’s MONARC line array technology. Engineered to
deliver high definition, high SPL sound reinforcement for a broad range
of applications, the MONARC MLA5 offers sound designers a flexible tool
for creating acoustically accurate coverage zones.
This article will explain the principles behind MONARC technology, the
research and history behind it’s development. As the MONARC line array
engineering project commenced nearly three years ago, McCauley Sound decided
to first examine and profile every aspect of large format touring so the
MONARC engineering team could develop a truly comprehensive perspective
on the needs of the industry.
Accordingly, the McCauley MONARC MLA5 is more than a summation of relevant
technologies. Instead, it is a engineered solution to the specific acoustic
and ergonomic problems the company was able to identify with help from
the “real people” of the industry.
The MLA5 addresses several shortcomings of early line-array designs. The
MLA5’s internal compliment, and it’s defining technology, the Intercell
Summation Aperture™ (ICS Aperture), is a certain departure from conventional
approaches.
From a physical, practical standpoint, the MLA5’s enclosure and rigging
hardware are designed to have the ability to be arrayed with up to 10°
splay between cells, without the need for any special hardware or multiple
enclosure designs.
Capable of being configured for the broadest possible range of applications,
the MLA5 may reduce the need for unnecessary and redundant product in
a touring company’s inventory.
BASIC LINE ARRAY THEORY
The line array phenomenon was described by Olsen in 1957 as “a group of
radiating elements closely spaced and operating with equal amplitude and
in phase”. The assumption is that all of the elements must be stacked
above or below each other, creating a vertical “line”.
The simplest example of a line-array performance is the narrowing of vertical
pattern when two or more transducers are “stacked” together. However,
this effect is only applicable when the spacing of the individual sources
is small, as compared to the lowest frequency it will be reproducing.
This relationship is represented by the equation:
FL=(1130 x 12) / EC
FL = upper frequency limit,
EC = distance between emissive centers (in inches)
Above this frequency, the dispersion pattern starts to exhibit lobing
and no longer acts as a singular sound source. Below this frequency, the
individual drive elements will combine to from a single wavefront, which
is the primary determining factor in defining line array behavior. The
primary advantages of this arrangement are that the combined drivers exhibit
an increase in vertical directivity (the vertical dispersion narrows)
while not affecting the horizontal coverage pattern as an extension of
the nearfield.
The differences between near field and far field are important to distinguish
when discussing line arrays. Simply, the far field begins at a distance
between eight and ten times the largest dimension of the array, however
this transition is not at a fixed point, it is frequency dependent. For
example, to calculate the transition point for an array of twelve MONARC
cells, 4.25m(13.9ft) tall, one would use the following equation:
DA =(HA^2)(FR)/690 = TA
DA= Distance from Array, HA = Height of Array
FR = Frequency of Interest, TA = Transition Area
In this case, at 500Hz, the far field starts at approximately 6.52m(21.4ft),
at 1000Hz, it is 13m(42.6ft), and at 8kHz, it would be 104m(341ft) from
the array. The unique purpose of a line array is that while the listener
remains within the near field, the sound intensity only drops -3dB per
doubling of distance, but once in the far field, SPL will drop at the
normal -6dB per doubling of distance.
Advantages of this approach are that combined drivers exhibit an increase
in vertical directivity (this means vertical dispersion narrows) while
not affecting horizontal coverage, in extension of the near field. This
is the defining design principle of the MONARC MLA5.
MINIMIZING MIDBAND DISTORTION
During the research phase of MONARC development, it became clear that
an alternative approach to midrange reproduction was needed. Severe distortion
effects were discovered and measured among the line array offerings of
the time. McCauley Sound engineers discovered that the smaller 6-8in midrange
drivers, while exhibiting a few desirable “hi-fi” characteristics, were
too fragile, and were producing an unacceptable level of comb filtering,
harmonic distortion, and general lobing artifacts.
|

Polar #1
the horizontal response of a typical line array MF
6.5
|
 |
Multiple smaller drivers were used for the midrange compliments
of many earlier line array systems, due to the theoretical spacing
needed in the vertical plane in order to achieve the desired summation
effects. McCauley Sound also began with this approach.
Assuming that a loading consisting of four small drivers would work
correctly in the vertical plane, McCauley Sound engineers started
by measuring the performance of 6.5in drivers to determine the best
geometric arrangement to achieve a constant dispersion pattern in
the horizontal plane. Our premise assumed that once a smooth, constant
horizontal pattern was achieved, it could be maintained once the
drivers were arrayed in the vertical plane.
|
|

Polar #2
the horizontal response of the MONARC HX32
|
 |
Several surprising problems appeared during this development stage.
The first problem was that regardless of the horizontal angle of
the drivers, lobing was present at levels as low as 800Hz and became
rather severe as they reached their upper limit goal of 1500 Hz
(See Polar #1).
This upper frequency was selected as a goal because, even with modern
high order filtering networks, midrange devices still contribute
significant SPL levels at 1500Hz when crossed over in the anticipated
1000Hz-1200Hz range.
The second obstacle was the degradation of frequency response within
individual driver units. Figure #1 shows the on-axis frequency response
of the test drivers.
|
Figure #2 shows the typical on-axis response of a pair of drivers, as
they would be loaded into the design with the angled baffle.
What is important to note is the significant variations in the curves,
whose response became progressively worse as the angle changed. Because
the primary function of a line array is to provide seamless, even, and
exceptionally consistent coverage, a design using the conventionally accepted
small midrange drivers would clearly not meet these goals.
Other concerns included the significantly large distortion products the
drivers produced, and just as problematic, the extremely limited dynamic
range these drivers exhibited. At an SPL level of 110dB measured at one
meter, a pair of the conventionally applied 7in drivers were, in the most
optimistic case, producing 3% to 4% harmonic distortion.
The drivers were also showing significant amounts of power compression
at this level (typically 3 to 9dBSPL) due to the limited size and heat
sinking capability of the voice coils required for drivers of this size.
This performance translated directly into a fatiguing sonic quality due
to distortion and limited dynamics due to power compression.
Conventional smaller midrange drivers, loaded in the enclosure style used
in existing line array designs, exhibited severe cancellations (up to
-18dB) within the drivers intended operating range.
TRIAL & ERROR IN R&D
McCauley’s engineering staff evaluated multiple combinations of cone materials,
motor structures, and baffle arrangements. This research and testing determined
that several severe limitations could not be overcome via conventional
use of small drivers in a line array application.
|

Figure #1 6.5in, no land
|
 |
As an alternative, McCauley experimented with 10in drivers. Despite
initial reservations regarding their vertical summation issues,
the 10in drivers exhibited near perfect horizontal dispersion characteristics
up to 1400Hz before collapsing. This performance was significantly
higher in frequency than all previously used 6in to 8in drivers.
With the horizontal dispersion remaining smooth and free of lobes
up to 1400Hz (See Polar #2), these drivers yielded a much smoother
on and off axis frequency response, and the sound was far more constant
across the entire coverage area.
|
|

Figure #2 in enclosure
|
 |
The next test was to see if these drivers could performing correctly
in the vertical plane. McCauley Sound found that as long as the
spacing between individual drive units was minimalized and kept
constant, they could maintain smooth, lobe free summation in the
vertical plane up to 1.7kHz and higher.
Our research yielded the HX32™ midrange driver which sums more efficiently,
when loaded into the MLA5 design geometry, and exhibits only a -2dB
variation compared to standard loading. (see Figure #3 vs. Figure
#4)
|
|

Figure #3 HX32, no load
|
 |
Specific to the MLA5, the unique HX32 overcomes the usual limitations
of standard large-format drivers, by significantly reducing harmonic
distortion and increasing responsiveness and is also far more durable
and powerful than the common 6-8in “hi-fi” cone.
Most importantly, the HX32 does not exhibit negative performance
characteristics such as high distortion product and destructive
lobing of the smaller, conventionally used midrange drivers.
|
|

Figure #4 HX32
loaded MLA5
|
 |
The HX32 midrange driver features a contoured, concave cone structure,
constructed of a proprietary Carbon-Nomex Honeycomb Composite. Composite
materials such as Kevlar have become popular in the last several
years, however the benefits of most come at some performance costs.
Cones made from pure spun or woven Carbon Fiber and Kevlar have
excellent sound qualities and are exceptionally durable, but unfortunately
they are almost always heavier than a cone made from paper based
material.
|
A cone driver with the necessary torsional and radial stiffness, required
for with such high acceleration demands, often weighs more than twice
the equivalent paper cones. This mass greatly limits their performance.
THE SANDWICH SOLUTION
McCauley Sound’s solution is unique in that they use a composite “sandwich”
layer process. The outer skins of the cone body are made from thin tightly
woven Carbon Fiber. A Nomex honey comb structure is “sandwiched” between
the two light layers of Carbon Fiber creating an exceptionally strong
and light weight material.
|

Internal structure
of the HX32s
Carbon Nomex Honeycomb core.
|
 |
This material has an ideal Young’s Modulus, is very well damped,
and has a mass break point substantially higher than any other single
source material, composite or natural.
Ten times stronger than paper, half the weight of pure carbon-fiber,
and a third the weight of a pure Kevlar cone, the HX32 cone is capable
of low coloration with very high sensitivity.
HX32 also retains the composites benefits such as low distortion
and durability without being subject to the negative effects such
as lower sensitivity and loss of sonic detail due to a heavy moving
mass.
|
Test data reveal the HX32 has the internal damping and response that
is comparable to state of the art hi-fi cones while being capable of delivering
the far higher professional SPLs.
The distortion products of the HX32 and the best measuring 7in are compared
in Figure #5. The drivers were measured at a distance of 1 meter and at
110dBSPL. The 7in drivers were measured together, as a pair, in order
to make a more accurate comparison, since all existing line array designs
which feature small-scale midrange drivers have them loaded in pairs (four
total, two in each hemisphere).
Note that the HX32’s distortion is well below 1% until 175Hz is reached,
at which point the primary component becomes the 2nd harmonic with the
more objectionable 3rd harmonic remaining well below 1.5 until 100Hz.
The THD curve is also free from any radical shifts in the distortion product,
giving the HX32 a smoother sound.
In comparison, the more widely used 6.5in driver shows rather substantial
amounts of distortion at this SPL level — typically 3% or higher. The
shape of the distortion product graph also indicates that the smaller
driver has varying amounts of THD at different frequencies, and (subjectively)
this could lead to inconsistencies in tonality and clarity at these frequencies.
The primary reasons for the high THD figures is the fact that at this
SPL the motor structure is almost totally nonlinear and the driver is
experiencing extreme power compression. These problems are avoided with
the use of a very durable and lightweight material in the cone structure.
Carbon-Nomex Honeycomb Com-posite is so strong, the entire cone surface
operates as a kinetically singular piston, which completely eliminates
phase cancellations which would result from the irregular movement and
“warping” of a weaker cone structure.
All midrange cones break up into destructive resonance modes as the motion
of the cone creates anti-uniformities, and the resulting interpolative
waves radiate towards their boundary zones.
However, due to the extraordinary stiffness of the HX32’s Carbon-Nomex
Honeycomb Composite cone structure, this break-up occurs at 2.3kHz, which
is well outside the driver’s usable bandwidth (it is crossed over at 1.2kHz).
The following graphs show that the HX32, despite being a larger driver,
exhibits a better Cumulative Spectral Decay than the 7in driver used for
comparison. The graph is plotted as time vs. Frequency and level, the
farthest line is the driver driven full bandwidth, then the signal is
removed and the next line forward is the amount of energy the driver emits
at the next time interval (in this case 0.29ms per graph) until we reach
10ms total time. This chart clearly illustrates the driver/cone resonances.
The shorter the decay time, the better.
As demonstrated, the highly responsive surface material allows the HX32
to reproduce mid band energy with a high degree of clarity and tonal detail
at substantially higher SPLs and with much lower distortion than anything
that has ever been achieved with any conventional midrange driver. The
MONARC MLA5 benefits from the enhanced performance of the HX32 by exhibiting
a measurable boost in intelligibility, especially in vocal and speech
reinforcement.
|

Top: Two typical line array midrange 7" played and measured
@ 110 dB.
Bottom: OneHX32 midrange 10" played and
measured @110 dB.
|
 |
INTERCELL COUPLING & DISPERSION CHARACTERISTICS
Most conventional line-array designs tend to rely on extensive waveguides
and intricate phase correction devices in order to achieve their
desired dispersion and mid /high coupling, at the expense of introducing
a significant amount of distortion and an overall harshness to the
sound.
High frequency (HF) waveforms are very fragile, so those same boundary
edges that are supposed to “guide ” the HF energy, are also causing
the waves to diffract, altering arrival times, and “smearing” the
sound.
Additionally, the design geometry and rigging schemes of most early
line array systems will create a large gap between the forward baffles
of adjacent enclosures when rigged to achieve near/down fill coverage.
This inconsistency produces audible “holes” in the near field coverage,
and the near field is where it is most noticeable to audience members.
Designs of this nature also exhibit two additional problematic behaviors;
the first is the “bounce”, or diffraction of the HF wave fronts,
due to the sudden introduction of a flat boundary that extends to
the front of the waveguide as the wave fronts emerge from the wave,
blocking the natural vertical dispersion pattern.
|
This causes a permanent source of comb filtering, and the resulting reflections
cause multiple sound sources to be heard, smearing the time signature
of transient sounds.
Secondly, designs that pivot at the rear of the enclosure are subject
to the diffraction effects of the top and bottom walls, and even worse,
as the splay angle is increased, the summation of the individual wavefronts
is disturbed as the distance between them is broadened.
These diffractions translate into a measurable loss of intelligibility
and obvious irregularities in the resulting dispersion patterns. McCauley
Sound designed the MLA5’s mid/high compliment, the ICS Aperture, to eliminate
such unnecessary diffractions and resulting distortions. The ICS Aperture’s
function is to allow the HF energy from HF waveguides to more efficiently
couple with the mid-band energy.
|

FIGURE #6
CSD of a high quality 6.5 midrange
driver. Notice the multiple ridges in the decay axis.
|
 |
This also reduces the amount of enclosure induced diffraction,
and allows the wave fronts to combine into a single seamless entity.
Easily recognizable as the “V” shaped section in the center of the
cell, the ICS Aperture achieves relatively distortion free mid/high
coupling for two reasons.
First, MLA5 cells always operate at a fixed frontal spacing, regardless
of cell-to-cell splay angles. For this reason, the McCauley Sound
the ICS Aperture design is a recessed “trench”, which extends vertically
from the top to the bottom of each cell.
|
|

FIGURE #7
the CSD of a McCauley HX32 midrangedriver. Notice
how the decay is smoother and
significantly faster than the driver in Figure #6.
|
 |
When flown, this creates an uninterrupted vertical HF energy source
that traverses the entire height of the array. Since the multiple
diffraction edges of an extended waveguide are not present to cause
distortion, and because the wavefront is not interrupted by large
gaps between enclosures, the HF energy now leaves the array undisrupted,
as a continuous line source.
The ICS Aperture and POWERLINK™ rigging work in conjunction; the
greater the inter-cell wrap is, the more efficient and higher in
frequency the summation effect becomes at close distances.
|
This way, audience members closest to the speakers always receive the
best sound possible, not the inconsistent sound of multiple disrupted
sources. This is key to the MLA5’s measurably high clarity and intelligibility.
MIDRANGE MANAGEMENT
The other key to achieving distortion-free propagation lies in the placement
and design of the midrange elements. In early line array designs, where
many small drivers would be clustered in close proximity, the uneven surface
topography of the midrange elements would agitate the passing HF waveforms,
causing distortions.
Within the ICS Aperture the quantity and intensity of these destructive
perturbations are greatly reduced, because the cone structure of the HX32
midrange drivers have been contoured to be physically invisible to the
passing HF energy. Again, unnecessary HF diffractions have been eliminated,
boosting the clarity of the performance.
When two HX32 midrange drivers are symmetrically arranged within the ICS
Aperture, they form both a solid and a kinetic boundary plane. This plane
acts as a zero-interfering waveguide for the exiting HF energy, while
also establishing the alignment intercept point for coupling with the
midband energy.
Without the interference of a physical waveguide, and no irregular protrusions
to disturb the passing waveforms, the ICS Aperture becomes an ideal environment
for guiding and coupling the mid and HF energies into a vertically continuous,
single-source, wide-band wavefront.
In addition, by nature, the MLA5’s ICS Aperture is capable of creating
a nearly perfect 90° horizontal dispersion pattern in the direct able
bands. Where many large format arrays exhibit significant “drop-off” or
“soft-shoulders”, as the listening position moves towards outer edges
of their horizontal coverage, a MONARC array’s mid / high dispersion is
both consistent, and nearly completely contained within a well defined
90° cone of coverage.
With the MONARC arrays’ ability to create a usable wavefront, measurably
consistent across the entire usable bandwidth out to 90° of the horizontal
plane, sound designers can rely on a high degree of predictability when
planning coverage zones.
INCREASING SPL HEADROOM
A significant weakness seen among early line-array designs was less-than-ideal
maximum SPL levels. While these early designs advanced the state of the
art by extending the uniformity of coverage over distance, they did so
at the expense of overall sound pressure level.
Their driver compliments were not capable of handling the higher power
needed to push the array’s combined output into the upper echelons of
performance.
McCauley Sound took several steps when engineering MONARC line-array technology
in order to overcome this SPL barrier. First, the MLA5’s unique design
geometry allows use of a larger, more powerful, and better matched compliment
of transducers. The MLA5 employs a 15in-10in-2in-10in-15in symmetrical
compliment.
Both LF 15ins are volumetrically loaded to create an acoustical impedance
match with the atmosphere and to reduce the individual cell’s Y-axis dimension
to under 14in. This volumetric loading of the LF section increases the
overall efficiency of the cell by focusing and reshaping the LF energy
in alignment with the midband dispersion.
Twin HX32 10in drivers flank either side of the ICS Aperture and represent
the midband energy. Finally, a proprietary Unified Titanium Diaphragm
high performance compression driver reproduces the remaining HF energy.
These components will naturally cross-over more far more smoothly due
to the graduated relative sizes.
The construction of the drivers contributes significantly to the array’s
SPL capability. Both the low frequency (LF) section’s transducers and
the HX32’s feature extremely heat tolerant Inwound™ 4in voice coils. To
illustrate the advantage of this, one must note that most conventional
drivers have their windings on the outside of the voice coil.
When these drivers get hot from normal operation, this winding expands,
and will eventually separate from the coil, causing the driver to short
out. McCauley Sound’s InWound technology places the windings inside of
the coil.
The coil itself is made from edge wound copper clad aluminum ribbon, and
then bonded to the Nomax/Kapton former with special heat-setting adhesives.
Not only is this combination both thermally and geometrically stable,
but the adhesives actually strengthen under intense heat.
|

Figure #8: In the "home" position, both the rigging pin
have not been moved. Notice how the rear of each adjoining cells
have collapsed together and now touch. This facilitates interconnecting
the cells, as seen in Figure #9.
|
 |
COOL BUSINESS
Predictably, when the driver gets hot, the winding expands uniformly
against the inside of the coil... reinforcing the voice coil, rather
than separating from it. This translates into a higher, and more
importantly, accurate rather than theoretical power rating.
Both the LF and MF sections benefit from the use of multiple spiders
in the suspension system. This design resists fatigue which gradually
degrades the performance of a transducer with a single spider suspensions.
Multiple spiders also help prevent damaging over-excursion of the
voice coil on LF peaks, eliminating performance degrading rattling
and flapping noise.
|
|

Figure #9: Both the rigging pin and the rigging arm have been freed.
The arm is swung upward so as to rest in the above cell's interlink
channel, then the pin is re-inserted, interconnecting and securing
the two cells. This process is duplicated on the opposite side.
|
 |
These unique features permit the LF/MF compliment of the MONARC
MLA5 to handle above average amounts of power. As such, the system
can be simply driven harder without risking failure. In addition,
the MLA5 is designed with a volumetrically-loaded LF section.
The overall cell height of the MLA5 is just over 13in, giving the
MLA5 an unusually low vertical profile. Additionally, the design
the ICS Aperture guarantees that there is no “dead” space between
adjacent cells.
Functionally, a MONARC array brings more “firepower” to bear in
the same amount of vertical space when compared to the typical rectangular
or rear hinging line array designs.
In a dead hang, measured at 300ft(91.4m), a 10-cell, 170in(432cm)
tall “conventional line” array is needed to achieve 110dB under
real-world conditions.
|
|

Figure #10: Once all connections have been made, the array is lifted
into the air. As each cell is lifted by chain hoist, the rear of
each cell slides apart until the rigging arm seats against the rigging
pin, thereby holding the splay angle in accordance to the chosen
pinning receptacle.
|
 |
Alternatively, in the same environment, an identical level of sound
pressure can be obtained from only an eight-cell, 112in(284cm) tall
McCauley MONARC™ array. That’s a 3:2 ratio when comparing array
heights, and a 5:4 ratios when comparing the number of enclosures.
When factoring in the increase in distortion product that a conventional
line array produces when operating at that level, compared to the
nearly distortion free wave front that the MONARC array will produce,
the difference between the two approaches is even more substantial.
RIGGING & TRANSPORT
MLA5’s are engineered to be exclusively operated in vertical arrays,
and in almost every situation will need to be flown to meet the
requirements of the event.
|
Therefore, all necessary rigging hardware is built into and is integrated
within the MONARC MLA5 cells. Also, since the array will need to cover
both near and far field audiences, each cell must be constructed to support
variety of curvatures.
The MONARC’s POWERLINK™ Integrated Rigging System was designed with simplicity
and efficiency in mind. This suspension technology allows a full 10° of
freedom per cell, requires no tools, has no extra pieces to lose, uses
no straps, no tethers, is not exposed to damage and requires no hand lifting
to fly.
This approach to rigging technology translates into quicker fly-times,
a wider range of possible splay angles, more accurate down fill, side
fill and upper balcony coverage, and easier packing and trucking. With
the POWERLINK system, the rigging process has been simplified so much
that, once on deck, two crew people can easily have the entire rig interlinked
and flown in under ten minutes.
The POWERLINK rigging system is essentially comprised of two different
mechanisms... the front-side tongues and the back-side “spine”. The front-side
of the POWERLINK system consists of two spring loaded, high-tensile steel
tongues, which are conveniently stored within the MONARC’s POWERLINK system
itself.
After both of the front quick release pins are removed, the tongues spring
out from their protective housing, and can be quickly and easily inserted
and secured into the next MONARC cell using the same quick-release rigging
pins. Once each cell has been connected to it’s neighbor, all of the cells
in the array are now locked together at a fixed front-side spacing of
just under 1/4in.
What is important to note, is that even though the MONARC cells are locked
together at this fixed spacing, the connection between the cells is hinged,
to permit vertical pivoting in either direction. This constant spacing
of the forward baffles is vital for maintaining the MONARC line array’s
acoustical coupling characteristics.
Once all the front-sides of every cell in the array have been interconnected,
and the top MLA5 cell has been secured to the bumper, the hoist operator
lifts the array approximately 5-6 feet off the deck, bringing as many
as ten MLA5 cells up in the air, but still within easy reach of the crew.
Hoisting the system off the deck causes the rear sides of the raised MONARC
cells to collapse together.
As with the front-side, the crew now moves to the backside of the raised
cells, and removes the quick-release rigging pins from the backside interlink
channel, which frees a swinging hinged arm from its’ home position within
the system’s spine. The arm is swung upward, and placed into the above
cell’s interlink channel.
Each interlink channel has a series of seven pinning receptacles, each
receptacle representing a possible splay angle ranging from 0° to 10°.
Quick release pins are simply inserted into the receptacle that represents
the splay angle desired. This secures the swinging arm and connects the
spine and the two adjoining cells.
Finally, castor boards (if used) are removed and set aside. The array
is lifted again, until the remaining cells collapse, and the process is
repeated. Once all cells are interconnected and secured, the array is
hoisted. When lifted into the air, the cells expand until they each reach
their specified splay angle.
FAST & FLEXIBLE
POWERLINK’s “spine” can be re-configured to create a completely rigid,
non-collapsible array, which is useful when building groundstacks or flying
radically tilted array configurations, as would be used for permanent
installations or non-concert events.
Regardless of chosen splay angles or final curvature, a MONARC array is
designed to “free” hang vertically from the bumper, does not require any
rear hoisting or bracing, even when configured for extreme down fill and
up fill balcony coverage. The POWERLINK rigging system is so flexible
that up to 10° of positive (upfiring) top cell splay can be achieved,
without any additional hardware, and without the need to radically tilt
the bumper.
|

As the array is being lifted, the castor boards snap off to be stored.
Alternatively, the system can be pre-linked, and rolled into the
venue in groups of four.
|
 |
With POWERLINK, sound designers can create practically any array
curvature, ranging from a straight hang to a completely collapsed
half-moon while maintaining a constant forward baffle spacing of
less than 1/4in between systems.
Keeping the forward-radiating baffles locked at a fixed spacing
of 1/4in is key to maintaining the wavefront summation characteristics
and other acoustic benefits that MONARC line array technology provides.
This tight, radical curvature can eliminate the need for separate
down fill systems, and can even eliminate front fills when the array
is properly configured.
|
Flying from a standard bumper system, the MONARC system can even achieve
down fill angles as extreme as nearly parallel to the deck, without the
need to be “raked” back behind the stage by straps or tether.
FOH benefits include boosted gain-before-feedback ratios from the mains,
with less stage interference, and a high quality, near-field listening
experience.
Each MONARC MLA5 cell comes equipped with a rugged, snap-on castor board,
which makes moving the MLA5 quick and efficient. The MLA5’s castor system
is designed to break away from the MLA5 cell without any extra parts or
tools to lose.
Once off-duty, the castors will interlock when stacked, to aid storage.
An optional FastPack™ cart allows up to four MLA5 cells to be stacked
and transported together, with their POWERLINK rigging pre-configured
for the next venue. This option streamlines truck-packing and reduces
the labor call.
July/August 2001 Live Sound International
|